A technique for simultaneously improving the product of cutoff frequency–breakdown voltage and thermal stability of SOI SiGe HBT
Fu Qiang1, 2, †, , Zhang Wan-Rong1, Jin Dong-Yue1, Zhao Yan-Xiao1, Wang Xiao1
College of Electronic Information and Control Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
College of Physics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: ffqqdudu@126.com

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61574010, 60776051, 61006059, and 61006044), the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant No. 4142007), and the Beijing Municipal Education Committee, China (Grant No. KM200910005001).

Abstract
Abstract

The product of the cutoff frequency and breakdown voltage (fT×BVCEO) is an important figure of merit (FOM) to characterize overall performance of heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT). In this paper, an approach to introducing a thin N+-buried layer into N collector region in silicon-on-insulator (SOI) SiGe HBT to simultaneously improve the FOM of fT×BVCEO and thermal stability is presented by using two-dimensional (2D) numerical simulation through SILVACO device simulator. Firstly, in order to show some disadvantages of the introduction of SOI structure, the effects of SOI insulation layer thickness (TBOX) on fT, BVCEO, and the FOM of fT×BVCEO are presented. The introduction of SOI structure remarkably reduces the electron concentration in collector region near SOI substrate insulation layer, obviously reduces fT, slightly increases BVCEO to some extent, but ultimately degrades the FOM of fT×BVCEO. Although the fT, BVCEO, and the FOM of fT×BVCEO can be improved by increasing SOI insulator SiO2 layer thickness TBOX in SOI structure, the device temperature and collector current are increased due to lower thermal conductivity of SiO2 layer, as a result, the self-heating effect of the device is enhanced, and the thermal stability of the device is degraded. Secondly, in order to alleviate the foregoing problem of low electron concentration in collector region near SOI insulation layer and the thermal stability resulting from thick TBOX, a thin N+-buried layer is introduced into collector region to not only improve the FOM of fT×BVCEO, but also weaken the self-heating effect of the device, thus improving the thermal stability of the device. Furthermore, the effect of the location of the thin N+-buried layer in collector region is investigated in detail. The result show that the FOM of fT×BVCEO is improved and the device temperature decreases as the N+-buried layer shifts toward SOI substrate insulation layer. The approach to introducing a thin N+-buried layer into collector region provides an effective method to improve SOI SiGe HBT overall performance.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the processing integration of high-performance SiGe heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT) with low-power CMOS on thin-film silicon on insulator (SOI), which forms SiGe BiCMOS technology,[13] has been considered as one of the most efficient and flexible techniques to meet the requirements for the microwave and radio frequency domain.[47] The substrate insulation layer SiO2 in SOI structure eliminates the collector-substrate PN junction, which causes the collector potential to be unable to go deep into the substrate, resulting in the fact that the charges accumulted in collector region near SOI insulation layer are much smaller than those in bulk HBTs. As a result, it suppress the charge collection in collector region near SOI insulation layer,[8] remarkably reducing the electron concentration in collector region near SOI substrate insulation layer, obviously increasing collector resistance, eventually substantially reducing the unity gain cutoff frequency (fT) in SOI SiGe HBT.[9] Meanwhile, the decrease of electron concentration in collector region near SOI substrate insulation layer is beneficial to the increase of breakdown voltage (BVCEO) to some extent, but it causes ultimately the product of cutoff frequency-breakdown voltage (fT×BVCEO) to decrease,[10] which is an important figure of merit (FOM) to characterize overall performance of HBT. On the other hand, the lower thermal conductivity of the insulation layer SiO2 in SOI structure can cause the device temperature to rise (self-heating effect), which results in the increase of the collector current rapidly, and even generates thermal runaway, and therefore degrades the thermal stability of the device.[11,12] In this paper, a technique to improve the FOM of fT×BVCEO is presented. A thin N+-buried layer is introduced into N collector region of SOI SiGe HBT for not only improving the FOM of fT×BVCEO, but also weakening the self-heating effect of the device.

2. SOI SiGe HBT structure

Compared with SiGe HBT on bulk silicon, SOI SiGe HBT owns the same emitter and base structure, but owns a different collector structure which is formed by introducing SOI substrate insulation layer into collector region.[13,14] Figure 1 shows the two-dimensional (2D) cross-section of traditional SOI SiGe HBT used in SILVACO/ATHENA, and the schematic diagram of structure parameters for SOI SiGe HBT is shown in Fig. 2. The SOI structure is comprised of 0.8-μm N silicon layer with an average doping concentration of 2×1016 cm−3 and a 50-nm buried oxide layer (BOX) on the top of 0.55-μm P substrate with an average doping concentration of 1×1015 cm−3. A 50-nm P SiGe with an average doping concentration of 1×1018 cm−3 and Ge fraction of 0.16 is deposited on SOI structure. A 0.2-μm P+ extrinsic base with a doping concentration of 3×1018 cm−3 is grown on the top of P SiGe base. After the growth of P+ extrinsic base layer, a 0.2-μm N+ POLY emitter with a doping concentration of 1×1020 cm−3 is deposited for reducing the emitter resistance, which simultaneously forms a 0.2-μm N Si emitter on the top of P SiGe base.

Fig. 1. 2D cross-section of traditional SOI SiGe HBT used in SILVACO/ATHENA.
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of structure parameters for traditional SOI SiGe HBT.

Figure 3 shows a novel SOI SiGe HBT with a thin N+-buried layer in N collector region, all the structure parameters are the same as those of traditional SOI SiGe HBT except thin N+-buried layer with a thickness of 50 nm. z is the distance from the N+-buried layer to SOI substrate insulation layer.

Fig. 3. Novel SOI SiGe HBT with thin N+-buried layer in N collector region (TBOX = 50 nm).
3. Results of traditional SOI SiGe HBT

Figure 4 shows the comparison of plot fTJC between traditional SOI SiGe HBT and standard SiGe HBT on bulk silicon. The peak unity gain cutoff frequency fT in traditional SOI SiGe HBT is 10.9 GHz, which is reduced by 44.1% compared with that of the standard SiGe HBT on bulk silicon (19.5 GHz).

Fig. 4. Comparison of plot fTJC between traditional SOI SiGe HBT and standard SiGe HBT on bulk silicon.

The result can be explained as follows.

The unity gain cutoff frequency (fT) in SiGe HBT is given in generally as[15]

where τec,SiGe is the total emitter-to-collector delay time in SiGe HBT, τec,SiGe is given by[16]

where τe,SiGe, τb,SiGe, and τbc,SiGe are the emitter, base, and collector transit times in SiGe HBT, τbc,SiGe and τe,SiGe are expressed as[17,18]

As CBOX formed by the introducing of SOI substrate insulation layer is in series with Ccb, the collector transit time in SOI SiGe HBT (τbc,SOISiGe) is written as

Substituting Eqs. (4) and (5) into Eq. (2), the total emitter-to-collector delay time in SOI SiGe HBT (τec,SOISiGe) is obtained as

where CBOX is the SOI insulation layer capacitance and Ccb is the base–collector junction capacitance, and other symbols have their usual meanings.

The introduction of SOI insulation layer SiO2 reduces base–collector equivalent capacitance because CBOX and Ccb are connected in series, which is beneficial to improving fT in traditional SOI SiGe HBT. But it also remarkably reduces the electron concentration in collector region near SOI insulation layer as shown in Fig. 5, thus leading to the obvious increase in the collector resistance, consequently the increase of τbc,SiGe, which is dominant, and eventually the decrease of fT.

Fig. 5. Electron concentration profiles in collector region for traditional SOI SiGe HBT and standard SiGe HBT on bulk silicon, respectively.

In addition, the decrease of electron concentration in collector region near SOI substrate insulation layer caused by the introduction of SOI insulation layer SiO2 results in the increase of BVCEO, as shown in Fig. 6. BVCEO improves from 8.9 V to 11.3 V, an increase of 27%. However, the product of fT×BVCEO decreases from 173.55 GHz·V to 123.17 GHz·V, a decrease of 29%. Table 1 compares traditional SOI SiGe HBT with standard SiGe HBT on bulk silicon.

Fig. 6. Absolute values of the base current versus VCE for traditional SOI SiGe HBT and standard SiGe HBT on bulk silicon, respectively.
Table 1.

Parameters for traditional SOI SiGe HBT and standard SiGe HBT on bulk silicon.

.

For the traditional SOI SiGe HBT, the fT can be improved by reducing CBOX in order to reduce τec,SOISiGe by adjusting the SOI insulation layer thickness (TBOX). Figure 7 shows the comparison of the plot fTJC for traditional SOI SiGe HBT among the cases of different TBOX values. With the increase of TBOX from 50 nm to 150 nm, the peak fT increases from 10.9 GHz to 12.9 GHz, an increase of 18.3%.

Fig. 7. Comparison of plot fTJC for traditional SOI SiGe HBT among the cases of different TBOX values.

However, the increase of TBOX also reduce the electron concentration in collector region near SOI insulation layer as shown in Fig. 8, which leads to the increase of the collector resistance, hence tend to the increase of τec,SOISiGe. However, the decrease of τec,SOISiGe by reducing CBOX due to the increase of TBOX is dominant. As a result, the peak fT increases with the increase of TBOX.

Fig. 8. Electron concentration profiles in collector region for traditional SOI SiGe HBT with different TBOX values.

The decrease of electron concentration in collector region near SOI insulation layer by increasing the TBOX also increases BVCEO as shown in Fig. 9. With the increase of TBOX from 50 nm to 150 nm, BVCEO improves from 11.3 V to 12.9 V, an increase of 14.2%, and the product of fT×BVCEO increases from 123.17 GHz·V to 166.41 GHz·V, an increase of 35.1%. Table 2 shows the comparison among SOI SiGe HBTs with different TBOX values.

Fig. 9. Plots of absolute values of the base current versus VCE for traditional SOI SiGe HBT with different TBOX values.
Table 2.

Parameters for traditional SOI SiGe HBTs with different TBOX values.

.

Although the increase of TBOX above improves fT, BVCEO, and fT×BVCEO, at the same time, it also causes the device surface temperature to rise as shown in Fig. 10. With the increase of TBOX from 50 nm to 150 nm, the peak device surface temperature (TPEAK) rises from 317 K to 323 K. The rising of the device surface temperature further enhances the self-heating effect of the device, so that the collector current is higher under the same high VBE bias condition as shown in Fig. 11, so the thermal stability of the device is degraded.[19,20]

Fig. 10. Device surface temperature profiles of traditional SOI SiGe HBT with different TBOX values.
Fig. 11. Comparisons among the plots of collector current versus VBE for traditional SOI SiGe HBT with different TBOX values.
4. Results of novel SOI SiGe HBT with a thin N+-buried layer

In order to alleviate the negative effect, i.e., the decrease of electron concentration in collector region and the degradation of thermal stability caused by the increase of TBOX due to lower thermal conductivity of the SiO2 in SOI structure, a thin N+-buried layer is introduced into the collector region as shown in Fig. 3.

Figure 12 shows the comparisons among plots of fT versus JC for novel SOI SiGe HBTs with different z values. With the decrease of z from 400 nm to 200 nm, the peak fT improves from 27.2 GHz to 34.6 GHz. The maximum improvement amplitude of fT is as high as 217.4% compared with that of traditional SOI SiGe HBT without N+-buried layer in collector region. This is attributed to the N+-buried layer in collector region which leads to remarkable increase of electron concentration in collector region near SOI insulation layer as shown in Fig. 13, significantly reducing the collector resistance, consequently reducing the τbc,SiGe, and obviously improving fT.

Fig. 12. Comparisonsof plot of fT versus JC between traditional SOI SiGe HBT and novel SOI SiGe HBT with different z values.
Fig. 13. Electron concentration profiles in collector region for traditional SOI SiGe HBT and novel SOI SiGe HBT with different z values.

Figure 14 shows plots of absolute values of the base current versus VCE for novel SOI SiGe HBT with different z values. BVCEO decreases slightly from 11.1 V to 10.5 V, but the product of fT×BVCEO increases from 301.9 GHz·V to 363.3 GHz·V. The maximum decrease amplitude of BVCEO is as slightly low as 7.1%, but the maximum increase amplitude of the product of fT×BVCEO is as obviously high as 195% compared with those in the case of traditional SOI SiGe HBT without N+-buried layer in collector region. Table 3 compares parameters for novel SOI SiGe HBTs with different locations of N+-buried layer in collector region.

Fig. 14. Plots of absolute value of the base current versus VCE for traditional SOI SiGe HBT and novel SOI SiGe HBT with different z values.
Table 3.

Parameters for traditional SOI SiGe HBT and novel SOI SiGe HBT with different z values.

.

As the position of N+-buried layer in collector region shifts toward SOI insulation layer, the device surface temperature is also reduced as shown in Fig. 15. Peak temperature TPEAK drops from 315.7 K down to 310.4 K. The peak temperature of TPEAK is reduced by 6.6 K compared with the case in traditional SOI SiGe HBT without N+-buried layer in collector region. Furthermore, the self-heating effect of the device is weakened, which means that the collector current is smaller under the same high VBE bias condition as shown in Fig. 16.

Fig. 15. Surface temperature profiles for traditional SOI SiGe HBT and novel SOI SiGe HBT with different z values.
Fig. 16. Comparisons of plot of collector current versus VBE between traditional SOI SiGe HBT and novel SOI SiGe HBT with different z values.
5. Conclusions

The existence of insulation layer SiO2 in traditional SOI SiGe HBT reduces the FOM of fT×BVCEO compared with the case in standard SiGe HBT on bulk silicon. By increasing insulation layer thickness TBOX, although the FOM of fT×BVCEO of traditional SOI SiGe HBT can be improved, the self-heating effect is enhanced and the thermal stability of the device is worsened. The introduction of a thin N+-buried layer into N collector region can alleviate these negative influences. The results show that the FOM of fT×BVCEO is greatly improved, at the same time, the device temperature is reduced, and the self-heating effect is weakened as the position of N+-buried layer in the collector region is shifted toward the substrate insulation layer. The effectiveness of the approach of introducing thin N+-buried layer into collector region in improving FOM of fT×BVCEO and the thermal stability are validated.

Reference
1Jain S CDecoutere SWillander Met al. 2001 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 16 R51
2Chen T BBabcock JNguyen Yet al.2008Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology MeetingOctober, 13–15, 2008Monterey, California, USA20810.1109/RELPHY.2003.1197770
3Zhang W RYang J WLiu H Jet al.2004International Conference on Microwave and Milli-wave Technology (ICMMR/T)August 18–21, 2004Beijing, China59410.1109/ICMMT.2004.1411599
4Jain S CDecoutere SWillander Met al. 2001 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 16 R67
5Liao S HWang W CChang S Tet al.IEEE Conference on Electron Devices & Solid-state CircuitDecember 20–22, 2007Tainan, China27110.1109/EDSSC.2007.4450114
6Mitrovic I ZBuiu OHall Set al. 2005 Solid-State Electron. 49 1556
7Bain MMubarek H A W EBonar J Met al. 2005 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 52 317
8Varadharajaperumal MNiu G FReed R Aet al. 2004 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 51 3298
9Frégronèse SAvenier GManeux Aet al. 2006 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 53 296
10Fu QZhang W RJin D Yet al. 2014 Chin. Phys. 23 114402
11Prasanna K MQureshi S 2014 J. Smicond. Technol. Sci. 14 274
12Cressler J D 2013 Silicon Monolithic Integrated Circuits in RF Systems 81
13Prasanna K MQureshi TENCON 2011 – 2011 IEEE Region 10 ConferenceNovember 21–24, 2011Bali, Indonesia79710.1109/TENCON.2011.6129220
14Chang S TLiu Y HLiu C WInternational Semiconductor Device Research SymposiumDecember 10–12, 2003Washington DC, USA1610.1109/ISDRS.2003.1271974
15Paul D J 2004 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 19 75
16Harame D LComfort J HCressler J Det al. 1995 IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 42 455
17Zhang BYang Y TLi Y JXu X B 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 238502 (in Chinese)
18Song J JYang CZhu HZhang H MXuan R XHu H YShu B 2004 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 118501 (in Chinese)
19Prasanna K MQureshi S 2013 IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society 1 92
20Hamawandi BNoroozi MJayakumar GErgül AZahmatkesh KToprak M SRadamson H H 2016 J. Semicond. 37 102001